Yeon Woo Ku vs Akiko Omae Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 12 Aug at 10:49 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
Y. Woo Ku vs A. Omae

KOR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

JPN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Ku 1 - 0 Omae
They have played 3 sets in total, with Yeon Woo Ku winning 2 and Akiko Omae winning 1. The last match between Yeon Woo Ku and Akiko Omae was at the W35 Aldershot, 12-08-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Yeon Woo Ku getting the victory 6-1 1-6 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ku | 1 |
| Omae | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W35 Aldershot(08-12-25)
Y. W. Ku vs A. Omae H2H Profile
Y. W. Ku vs A. Omae Match Preview:
- How does Omae's second serve performance compare to Ku's? Omae has a slight edge, winning 39.26% of points against Ku's 39.06% in recent play.
- Which player has the upper hand in return games? Ku has a slight advantage, with a 52.08% winning rate on opponent second serves compared to Omae's 51.85%.
- What about first serve return stats? Ku leads here as well, securing 35.88% of points against 31.94% for Omae.
- In breakpoint defense, who performs better? Ku outperforms, saving 48.76% of breakpoints, while Omae saves 44.09%.
- Lately, Ku has shown superior match results, winning 64.79% of their matches compared to Omae's 51.72%.
- On which surfaces do the players excel? Omae thrives on grass with a 58% win rate, while Ku excels on indoor hard courts at 69%.
- Considering the quality of rivals faced, Ku has competed against slightly stronger players, with an average opponent rank of 406.3 compared to Omae's 418.52.
- In deciding sets, which player exhibits better resilience? Omae has prevailed in 50% of deciding sets, while Ku has won 41%.
- Examining break point conversion, Omae has a minimal advantage, converting 41.67% of opportunities to Ku's 39.18%.
Editorial Prediction (August 12, 2025, UTC):
In analyzing the recent performance and statistical data for Omae and Ku, it's clear that both competitors have their respective strengths and opportunities. Omae shows resilience in deciding sets which can be crucial in tight matches, reflecting a competitive mental edge.
However, Ku shows superiority in several key areas. Their slightly better return games and breakpoint defense suggest a capability to challenge and disrupt Omae's service games effectively. Moreover, their higher overall win percentage and stronger historical performance against more formidable opponents position Ku as a formidable contender.
Taking into account these factors, despite Omae’s robust performance in crucial match points, Ku demonstrates consistent advantages that are likely to convert into a victory in their upcoming match.
Based on these insights, Ku is the likely favorite to win the forthcoming match.
Yeon Woo Ku vs Akiko Omae Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Y. W. Ku vs A. Omae H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 13 | Games Won | 9 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:55:2 | Average Match Time | 1:55:2 |
| 67% (47/70) | 1st Serve % | 63% (55/87) |
| 66% (31/47) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (29/55) |
| 30% (7/23) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (14/32) |
| 33% (6/18) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (4/8) |
| 51% (44/87) | Return Points Win % | 46% (32/70) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
Y. W. Ku Recent Matches Played
A. Omae Recent Matches Played

Y. W. Ku vs A. Omae Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64.83% (212/115) | YTD Win/Loss | 53.48% (338/294) |
| 63.86% (477/270) | Sets Win/Loss | 53.76% (764/657) |
| 57.18% (3850/2883) | Games Win/Loss | 51.78% (6635/6178) |
| 64.59% (166/91) | Hard Win/Loss | 55.12% (253/206) |
| 64.86% (24/13) | Clay Win/Loss | 29.73% (11/26) |
| 68.97% (20/9) | Indoor Hard W/L | 52.75% (48/43) |
| 50.00% (2/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 57.78% (26/19) |
| 0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 234 | Aces Total | 356 |
| 0.32 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 1048 | Total Double Faults | 811 |
| 1:25:43 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 462.73 | Average Opponent Rank | 598.53 |
| 64% (12133/18964) | 1st Serve % | 63% (12851/20538) |
| 61% (7379/12133) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (7797/12851) |
| 45% (3096/6831) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (3573/7687) |
| 52% (1445/2788) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (1216/2490) |
| 50% (9520/18945) | Return Points Win % | 45% (9467/21062) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 20.00% (1/4) |
| 28.57% (2/5) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50.00% (4/4) | Main Tour W/L | 8.33% (1/11) |
| 62.83% (142/84) | Challenger W/L | 54.10% (290/246) |
| 74.42% (64/22) | Futures W/L | 58.23% (46/33) |
| 65% (210/323) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (330/615) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 49% (33/68) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (66/126) |
| 43% (40/93) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (75/169) |
| 86% (218/187) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (347/295) |
| 14% (218/31) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (347/45) |
| 23% (109/25) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (284/40) |